All of Grace

An online community where believers can come and be challenged, edified and equipped with the Word of God unto every good work.
 
HomeHome  ­FAQFAQ  ­SearchSearch  ­RegisterRegister  ­MemberlistMemberlist  ­UsergroupsUsergroups  ­Log inLog in  
Post new topic   Reply to topicShare | 
 

 Sir Michael

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
simply seth




PostSubject: Sir Michael   Tue May 12, 2009 1:19 pm

are you dispy or covenant ?

how did you reach your current position ?

what resources aided you in reaching your current position ?

study

_________________
“God had one Son without sin, but not a single child without the rod”

"You cannot make a sinner into a saint by killing him. He who does not live as a saint here will never live as a saint hereafter."

~CH Spurgeon
Back to top Go down
View user profile
TrueConvert




PostSubject: Re: Sir Michael   Thu May 14, 2009 10:47 am

simply seth wrote:
are you dispy or covenant ?

how did you reach your current position ?

what resources aided you in reaching your current position ?

study

I'm not Michael, but I am Disp Set!!!!! Good to be back on All of Grace's forum. Holla!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Michael
Administrator



PostSubject: Re: Sir Michael   Thu May 14, 2009 10:54 am

I'm what they'd call a leaky dispensationalist...lol.

What resources? The Bible. That's it basically. Not trying to be smart here.

_________________
It's true that doctrine divides. It's also true that love unifies. The unity we have in the faith is rooted and grounded in truth and love. Remove truth (right theology and doctrine) from the mix and you have less than Biblical unity. Remove love and you have no unity. Love causes us to seek truth and share that truth with others so that we become more unified. God is truth, and as we are more acquainted with His truth, the closer we are to Him, and the closer we become to each other
Back to top Go down
View user profile
simply seth




PostSubject: Re: Sir Michael   Thu May 14, 2009 12:08 pm

Michael wrote:
I'm what they'd call a leaky dispensationalist...lol.

What resources? The Bible. That's it basically. Not trying to be smart here.


If ya wanted ta be smart .. you woulda gave me scripture

scratch

_________________
“God had one Son without sin, but not a single child without the rod”

"You cannot make a sinner into a saint by killing him. He who does not live as a saint here will never live as a saint hereafter."

~CH Spurgeon
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Jewel




PostSubject: Re: Sir Michael   Thu May 14, 2009 12:25 pm

For those of us who are a bit challenged, can you explain what "dispy and covenant"? I was gonna act too proud to ask questions, but how far will that get me?

_________________
"The Comforter be always with thee, good Christian, to guide thee in the way that leads to the city.”---Pilgrim's Progress
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Michael
Administrator



PostSubject: Re: Sir Michael   Thu May 14, 2009 12:32 pm

Hey Jewel,

Take a look at these wiki articles for now:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covenant_Theology

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispensationalism

_________________
It's true that doctrine divides. It's also true that love unifies. The unity we have in the faith is rooted and grounded in truth and love. Remove truth (right theology and doctrine) from the mix and you have less than Biblical unity. Remove love and you have no unity. Love causes us to seek truth and share that truth with others so that we become more unified. God is truth, and as we are more acquainted with His truth, the closer we are to Him, and the closer we become to each other
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Jewel




PostSubject: Re: Sir Michael   Thu May 14, 2009 12:39 pm

Michael wrote:
Hey Jewel,

Take a look at these wiki articles for now:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covenant_Theology

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispensationalism


OOOOHHH. Got it. Thanks, Mike. So, when you say you're a "Leaky" dispensationalist, what do you mean?

_________________
"The Comforter be always with thee, good Christian, to guide thee in the way that leads to the city.”---Pilgrim's Progress
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Michael
Administrator



PostSubject: Re: Sir Michael   Thu May 14, 2009 12:56 pm

Well, when Dispensationalism first arose on the scene, it basically said this (as summarized by Dr. MacArthur):

Quote:
"That the Bible taught a unique place for Israel and that the Church could not fulfill God's promises to Israel, therefore, there is a still a future and a kingdom involving the salvation and the restoration and the reign of the nation Israel (historical Jews)."


Like MacArthur, that's as far as I'll go with Dispensationalism. Some Dispensationalist not only see a distinction between Israel and the Church, but also one between what the New Covenant means for Israel and what it means for the Church. I think some go way too far. I believe that God has a real future plan for Israel that is different than the plan He has for the Church.

To make it simpler for me since my lunch break is almost over, I'll link you to Dr. MacArthur's take, which I agree with.

http://www.biblebb.com/files/macqa/70-16-9.htm

_________________
It's true that doctrine divides. It's also true that love unifies. The unity we have in the faith is rooted and grounded in truth and love. Remove truth (right theology and doctrine) from the mix and you have less than Biblical unity. Remove love and you have no unity. Love causes us to seek truth and share that truth with others so that we become more unified. God is truth, and as we are more acquainted with His truth, the closer we are to Him, and the closer we become to each other
Back to top Go down
View user profile
simply seth




PostSubject: Re: Sir Michael   Thu May 14, 2009 1:01 pm

Michael wrote:
Well, when Dispensationalism first arose on the scene, it basically said this (as summarized by Dr. MacArthur):

Quote:
"That the Bible taught a unique place for Israel and that the Church could not fulfill God's promises to Israel, therefore, there is a still a future and a kingdom involving the salvation and the restoration and the reign of the nation Israel (historical Jews)."


Like MacArthur, that's as far as I'll go with Dispensationalism. Some Dispensationalist not only see a distinction between Israel and the Church, but also one between what the New Covenant means for Israel and what it means for the Church. I think some go way too far. I believe that God has a real future plan for Israel that is different than the plan He has for the Church.

To make it simpler for me since my lunch break is almost over, I'll link you to Dr. MacArthur's take, which I agree with.

http://www.biblebb.com/files/macqa/70-16-9.htm


Thank you brutherrrr Michael
I appreciate you. Cool

_________________
“God had one Son without sin, but not a single child without the rod”

"You cannot make a sinner into a saint by killing him. He who does not live as a saint here will never live as a saint hereafter."

~CH Spurgeon
Back to top Go down
View user profile
 

Sir Michael

View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions of this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
All of Grace :: Theology :: General Theology-
Post new topic   Reply to topic